Character Information
Jul. 17th, 2037 08:31 am![]()
|
Short Drop, Sudden Stop PERSONALITY
HISTORY
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
Alternative Universes:
|
![]()
|
Short Drop, Sudden Stop PERSONALITY
HISTORY
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
Alternative Universes:
|
| |
| UN Agency | |
|---|---|
Emblem of the DPRD | |
| Abbreviation | DPRD |
| Motto | Scientia et Defensio Humanitatis ("Knowledge and the Defence of Humanity") |
| Formation | 1952 |
| Type | UN specialized agency |
| Headquarters | Geneva, Switzerland |
| Parent organization | United Nations |
| Executive Director | Rotating appointee |
| Main organ | DPRD Council |
| Website | None |
The Department of Paranormal and Reality Defense (DPRD) is an international organization tasked with investigating, monitoring, and mitigating anomalous phenomena that pose potential threats to human life, culture, or the environment. Its operations range from research and documentation to strategic advisory and field intervention.
DPRD agents are trained to conduct systematic investigations into phenomena that fall outside conventional scientific understanding, including:
Investigations are carried out by multi-disciplinary teams comprising field agents, scientists, occult specialists, and behavioral analysts, using advanced detection equipment, surveillance technologies, and field sensors to identify anomalous patterns and signatures.
All incidents are documented following strict methodologies to ensure evidentiary integrity:
The DPRD provides guidance to the United Nations and national governments on mitigation strategies and policy development, including:
When authorized, DPRD teams intervene directly to contain or neutralize threats to life, culture, or the environment:
Instituted in 2009, the Erskine Scale (named after Dr. Abraham Erskine, creator of the original "Super Soldier Serum") is a five-tier metric employed by analysts within the DPRD to evaluate both the power level and potential risk posed by superpowered individuals. The scale is applied to figures such as Steve Rogers, Tony Stark, and Kamala Khan, providing a standardized framework for tactical assessment, containment planning, and threat mitigation.
The Erskine Scale is designed to:
| Level | Definition | Operational Notes | Example Individuals |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-1 Enhanced | Individuals exhibiting mild superhuman abilities or enhancements, with minimal risk to civilians or operations. | Standard monitoring recommended. Usually requires no specialized containment; can be integrated into cooperative operations. | Early-stage super soldiers, minor powered civilians |
| E-2 Augmented | Noticeable superhuman traits providing tactical advantages in combat or specialized tasks. | Field monitoring advised. May require limited containment or operational oversight to prevent collateral damage. Tactical integration possible. | Enhanced soldiers, tech-enhanced individuals, trained superhumans |
| E-3 Superhuman | Capable of altering urban-scale conflicts; abilities exceed normal human limits significantly. | Active monitoring required. Contingency plans must consider potential destruction of urban infrastructure and civilian risk. Specialized containment units recommended. | Veteran super soldiers, powered vigilantes, high-capacity armored or energy-manipulating individuals |
| E-4 Global Threat | Individuals with the potential for mass destruction or destabilization on a national or international scale. | High-priority threat assessment. Immediate containment or neutralization protocols necessary. Coordination with international security agencies advised. | World-class villains, rogue superhumans with destructive capabilities, large-scale powered militaries |
| E-5 Existential | Entities possessing reality-altering or extinction-level abilities capable of threatening humanity or the planet itself. | Extreme containment required. Direct engagement only by specialized task forces. Full-scale emergency protocols and intergovernmental coordination mandatory. | Reality-warping beings, cosmic-level threats, superhuman entities with planet-level destructive capacity |
| Level | Definition | Operational Notes | Example Entities |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Catastrophic | Entities capable of global-scale destruction or existential threats. Immediate containment required. | Deploy full containment protocols. Evacuate civilians if necessary. Direct engagement only by specialized task forces. | Apocalyptic deities, primordial chaos beings, uncontained reality-warping entities |
| 2 Severe | Capable of mass-casualty events or significant infrastructure collapse. Strict containment required. | Monitor closely; rapid-response teams on standby. Limited interaction to trained personnel. | War gods, highly aggressive pantheon members, entities manipulating elemental forces at large scale |
| 3 Moderate | Contained impact; may cause serious localized disruption if uncontrolled. | Secure containment areas; regular monitoring and documentation. Limited public disclosure permissible. | Minor deities, trickster spirits with volatile abilities, moderately powerful mythic creatures |
| 4 Low | Minimal hostility; incidents infrequent or easily managed. | Passive observation recommended; field agents may interact under supervision. Maintain incident logs. | Benevolent minor spirits, protective household deities, mythic messengers |
| 5 Beneficial | Entities that provide clear, tangible benefits to human operations or communities, often actively enhancing safety, health, or wellbeing. | Engagement encouraged; may assist in crisis response or protective duties. Maintain documentation and establish cooperative protocols. | Guardian angels actively shielding civilians, elemental spirits improving crop yields, mythic healers |
| 6 Supportive | Actively cooperative with human authorities; may provide aid or guidance in limited situations. | Utilize for intelligence gathering, crisis response, or ritual assistance. Maintain diplomatic protocols. | Prophetic figures, divinely aligned intermediaries, mythic allies responding to human requests |
| 7 Passive/Neutral | Entities indifferent to human activity; neither helpful nor harmful. Interaction is rare and incidental. | Low-priority monitoring; engagement only if accidental interaction occurs. Cataloging recommended. | Wandering spirits with no documented effects, mythic creatures in remote regions, dormant divine echoes |
| 8 Inert | Dormant or non-interactive; negligible impact on humans or the environment. | Recorded for completeness; no active monitoring required. Can be reclassified if activity is detected. | Ancient statues imbued with divine energy, dormant avatars, sealed mythic relics |
Since its inception, the Department for Paranormal Research and Defence (DPRD) has been involved in numerous incidents that have sparked debate over its methods, scientific legitimacy, and political neutrality. Several events remain the subject of ongoing controversy.
A leaked internal report revealed that the DPRD had operated a covert facility beneath the Wawel Castle complex in Poland. The memorandum described experimentation on alleged demonic artifacts without parliamentary oversight. The Polish government accused the DPRD of violating national sovereignty, and although the facility was dismantled, the scandal damaged the department’s credibility in Eastern Europe.
Survivors of a mass cult investigation in Peru claimed they were unlawfully detained and subjected to coercive psychological practices by DPRD operatives. Amnesty International condemned the department for human rights abuses. A 1992 independent review concluded that detainees had indeed been held in inhumane conditions, sparking international debate over the balance between security and civil liberties in paranormal investigations.
DPRD analysts reported an “interdimensional breach” in São Paulo, Brazil, prompting large-scale intervention and the evacuation of two districts. Subsequent investigations by geophysicists found no evidence of rift activity, leading critics to accuse the DPRD of misinterpreting seismic events. Conspiracy theorists later suggested the incident was fabricated to secure expanded funding. The controversy remains one of the most frequently cited challenges to the department’s scientific credibility.
In July 2013, the British Royal Navy frigate HMS Dauntless was reportedly boarded by anomalous assailants while on patrol in the Lesser Antilles. Survivors described the attackers as “undead” in appearance. Several sailors were killed, and Commodore James Norrington was held captive for nearly a week before recovery. The DPRD classified the event as a Level II paranormal incursion, citing possible connections to resurgent maritime cult activity. The department faced criticism for its lack of transparency, while Norrington’s subsequent recruitment as a field agent raised concerns over the militarisation of the DPRD’s ranks.
Leaked cables suggested that DPRD operatives had supported NATO forces during the conflict in Eastern Ukraine under the justification of containing “non-human combatants.” Russian state media accused the DPRD of acting as a cover for espionage and interventionism. Although the department denied the claims, the incident strained its reputation as a neutral international body and nearly resulted in the loss of its UN funding mandate. It also lead to the director of the time, Dr. Anton Volkov, giving up Russian citizenship and claiming refuge in America.
This fictional article is a creative parody inspired by Wikipedia style, intended for entertainment and storytelling purposes only.